During my ongoing curation of articles about learning, digital tools and social media, I recently came across this article exploring perspectives on social media in the lecture theatres. Although the article was primarily examining post secondary perspectives, I would argue the same discussions are relevant in K12. The discussion was centred around various viewpoints on whether or not students:
- be allowed (by profs) to bring technology to class
- are distracted by having access to social media and
- experience benefits?
Two interviewees interviewed commented that “… because the students are most likely taking notes. Many don’t use pen and paper, and rely on their devices. She says students are old enough to decide if they are to learn or not.” and “My view is they are old enough to choose and multitask (and choose to fail too),“. Meanwhile, others choose to dictate “no access”.
Now, if I put a personal perspective on this and let you observe my learning mode, this is what you would see. Typically I use 2 devices … taking notes on my iPad using notability – not just for notes – adding audio recording, and insert photos for context for a more complete package. On the second device I organize lists, todos, ideas and share via social media, typically Twitter but this could easily be a Facebook group, G+ community, LinkedIn or open Google doc. I reiterate – this is MY style. This is how I learn best. Paper and pen doesn’t work for me.
Why not let students choose what works best for them – student voice. To me, letting students choose what tools they use and how they organize shows a strength based approach to student learning. What benefit is there in forcing students to function in a way that may not be self directed and self optimized?
Weigh in: Where do you stand?
During a recent trip to the Netherlands, we had the opportunity to visit the Netherlands Open Air Museum & Park. It is an interesting stop. Additional information is available in this Wikipedia article.
One of the points of interest at the site was the Village School (Lhee Dr.) originally built in 1750, relocated in 1953. The interior as you see it in my photos is vintage 1800-1830.
I have added comments to each photo applying a current educational lens.
A peek in the door: open space and welcoming.
Central heating, flexible space (no rows!), support for small group instruction and a respectful design reflecting that learning is social.
Evidence of the use of mobile tablets to support personal educational experiences.
Hands on, independent use of tablets. It looks like they are actually drawing on the screens so I am assuming that these are not touch-screens. I wonder about the wifi access.
On a more serious note, this early classroom was certainly forward looking in many respects. Perhaps they were simply learning while waiting for the thinking around the C’s and the whole ‘internet thing’ to become a reality.
When I saw this tweet this morning, it reminded of a recent conversation with Rod Lucier where the point of discussion centred around the ideas that:
a) all positions have leadership components and
b) perhaps the best leadership position is the one you are in.
Using this tweet as a prompt, I think it is time worthy to reflect on the leadership traits described here.
What changes will you make to your practice?
Note: Cross posted to OSSEMOOC
This tweet from @ScottMcKenzie27 caught my attention this week.
The approach Scott is taking with digital citizenship in his classroom really brings it to life through relationships, conversation, collaboration and a real world connected learning experience.
Thank you for sharing your work and learning openly Scott.
Note: Cross post to OSSEMOOC
Interesting things that caught my eye during the past week:
Link to picture
Link to article
Link to article